Tennis Schedule

Agatha rates Gina Feistel 1413 and Elena Ruxandra Bertea 1503, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 90 rating points toward Elena Ruxandra Bertea, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Elena Ruxandra Bertea in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Viktoria Hruncakova 1516 and Anastasia Tikhonova 1466, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 51 rating points toward Viktoria Hruncakova, which projects to a 58 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Viktoria Hruncakova in 2-0, about 53 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Erika Andreeva 1520 and Elena Micic 1532, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 13 rating points toward Elena Micic, which projects to a 52 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Elena Micic in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Fiona Crawley 1587 and Lois Boisson 1664, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 77 rating points toward Lois Boisson, which projects to a 61 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Lois Boisson in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Priska Nugroho 1485; Yujia Huang has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 12 rating points toward Priska Nugroho, which projects to a 52 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Priska Nugroho in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Amelia Rajecki 1437; Chengyiyi Yuan has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 55 rating points toward Chengyiyi Yuan, which projects to a 58 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Chengyiyi Yuan in 2-0, about 53 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Guo Meiqi 1457; Kristiana Sidorova has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 139 rating points toward Kristiana Sidorova, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Kristiana Sidorova in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Wang Jiaqi 1365 and Zheng Wushuang 1448 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 83 rating points toward Zheng Wushuang, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Zheng Wushuang in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Sara Saito 1418; Chenting Zhu has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 25 rating points toward Sara Saito, which projects to a 53 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Sara Saito in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Mei Yamaguchi 1497 and Zheng Wushuang 1466 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 31 rating points toward Mei Yamaguchi, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Mei Yamaguchi in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Yang Yidi 1348 and Fiona Ferro 1625 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 277 rating points toward Fiona Ferro, which projects to a 81 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Fiona Ferro in 2-0, about 64 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Jenson Brooksby 1708 and Nikoloz Basilashvili 1622 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 87 rating points toward Jenson Brooksby, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Jenson Brooksby in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Alexandre Muller 1668 and Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 1819 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 151 rating points toward Alejandro Davidovich Fokina, which projects to a 69 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Alejandro Davidovich Fokina in 2-0, about 58 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Adrian Mannarino 1678 and Denis Shapovalov 1770 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 91 rating points toward Denis Shapovalov, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Denis Shapovalov in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Lloyd Harris 1696 and Hubert Hurkacz 1801 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 105 rating points toward Hubert Hurkacz, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Hubert Hurkacz in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Fabian Marozsan 1719 and Kyrian Jacquet 1611 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 108 rating points toward Fabian Marozsan, which projects to a 64 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Fabian Marozsan in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Hugo Gaston 1609 and Andrey Rublev 1812 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 203 rating points toward Andrey Rublev, which projects to a 76 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Andrey Rublev in 2-0, about 61 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Roman Safiullin 1709 and Bu Yunchaokete 1649 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 60 rating points toward Roman Safiullin, which projects to a 57 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Roman Safiullin in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Daniil Medvedev 1905 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong 1710 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 195 rating points toward Daniil Medvedev, which projects to a 74 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Daniil Medvedev in 2-0, about 60 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Maya Joint 1744 and Kimberly Birrell 1736 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 8 rating points toward Maya Joint, which projects to a 50 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Maya Joint in 2-0, about 50 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Leylah Fernandez 1817 and Talia Gibson 1736 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 81 rating points toward Leylah Fernandez, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Leylah Fernandez in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Maria Timofeeva 1724 and Reese Brantmeier 1635 on clay, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 90 rating points toward Maria Timofeeva, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Maria Timofeeva in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Berfu Cengiz 1470 and Teodora Kostovic 1649, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 179 rating points toward Teodora Kostovic, which projects to a 72 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Teodora Kostovic in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales 1670 and Julia Grabher 1666 on clay, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 3 rating points toward Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales, which projects to a 50 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales in 2-0, about 50 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Zachary Svajda 1653 and Aleksandar Kovacevic 1616 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 38 rating points toward Zachary Svajda, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Zachary Svajda in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Stefanos Tsitsipas 1806 and Yoshihito Nishioka 1663 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 144 rating points toward Stefanos Tsitsipas, which projects to a 69 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Stefanos Tsitsipas in 2-0, about 58 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Rinky Hijikata 1692 and Camilo Ugo Carabelli 1552 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 140 rating points toward Rinky Hijikata, which projects to a 68 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Rinky Hijikata in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Jaume Munar 1743 and Marcos Giron 1644 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 99 rating points toward Jaume Munar, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Jaume Munar in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Arthur Fils 1940 and Martin Damm 1679 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 260 rating points toward Arthur Fils, which projects to a 80 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Arthur Fils in 2-0, about 64 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Lorenzo Sonego 1687 and Kamil Majchrzak 1682 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 5 rating points toward Lorenzo Sonego, which projects to a 53 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Lorenzo Sonego in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Dayana Yastremska 1706; Jiayi Wang has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 206 rating points toward Dayana Yastremska, which projects to a 74 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Dayana Yastremska in 2-0, about 60 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Harriet Dart 1604 and Tiphanie Lemaitre 1423 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 182 rating points toward Harriet Dart, which projects to a 73 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Harriet Dart in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Ren Yufei 1337 and Ma YeXin 1567 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 230 rating points toward Ma YeXin, which projects to a 76 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Ma YeXin in 2-0, about 61 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Carol Zhao 1372; Vivian Wolff has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 14 rating points toward Vivian Wolff, which projects to a 52 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Vivian Wolff in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Mina Hodzic 1469 and Bai Zhuoxuan 1611 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 142 rating points toward Bai Zhuoxuan, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Bai Zhuoxuan in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates James Duckworth 1629; Te Rigele has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 276 rating points toward James Duckworth, which projects to a 80 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: James Duckworth in 2-0, about 64 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Yannick Hanfmann 1718 and Tomas Machac 1762 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 44 rating points toward Tomas Machac, which projects to a 55 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Tomas Machac in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Kyoka Okamura 1512; Ru Xi Wu has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 4 rating points toward Ru Xi Wu, which projects to a 50 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Ru Xi Wu in 2-0, about 50 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Sara Saito 1418; Chenting Zhu has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 25 rating points toward Sara Saito, which projects to a 53 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Sara Saito in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Alevtina Ibragimova 1595; Darya Khamutsianskaya has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 40 rating points toward Alevtina Ibragimova, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Alevtina Ibragimova in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Tyra Caterina Grant 1594 and Aliona Falei 1458 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 136 rating points toward Tyra Caterina Grant, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Tyra Caterina Grant in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Mei Yamaguchi 1497 and Zheng Wushuang 1466 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 31 rating points toward Mei Yamaguchi, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Mei Yamaguchi in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Viktoria Morvayova 1481 and Sara Sorribes Tormo 1633 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 152 rating points toward Sara Sorribes Tormo, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Sara Sorribes Tormo in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Rina Saigo 1496; Alexandra Shubladze has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 8 rating points toward Rina Saigo, which projects to a 50 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Rina Saigo in 2-0, about 50 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Kristina Mladenovic 1447 and Sofia Costoulas 1543 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 95 rating points toward Sofia Costoulas, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Sofia Costoulas in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Katarina Zavatska 1479 and Sofya Lansere 1373 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 106 rating points toward Katarina Zavatska, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Katarina Zavatska in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Jessica Bouzas Maneiro 1679 and Tian Fangran 1598 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 81 rating points toward Jessica Bouzas Maneiro, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Jessica Bouzas Maneiro in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Yang Yidi 1348 and Fiona Ferro 1625 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 277 rating points toward Fiona Ferro, which projects to a 81 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Fiona Ferro in 2-0, about 64 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Lu Jia-Jing 1442 and Hayu Kinoshita 1449 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 6 rating points toward Hayu Kinoshita, which projects to a 50 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Hayu Kinoshita in 2-0, about 50 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Wei Sijia 1467; Yujia Huang has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 44 rating points toward Yujia Huang, which projects to a 57 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Yujia Huang in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Haruka Kaji 1399 and Emerson Jones 1553 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 154 rating points toward Emerson Jones, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Emerson Jones in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Katarzyna Kawa 1562; Rinko Matsuda has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 201 rating points toward Katarzyna Kawa, which projects to a 73 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Katarzyna Kawa in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Valeria Savinykh 1468 and Irene Burillo 1438 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 30 rating points toward Valeria Savinykh, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Valeria Savinykh in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Elsa Jacquemot 1571 and Li Zongyu 1439 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 132 rating points toward Elsa Jacquemot, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Elsa Jacquemot in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Andrea Lazaro Garcia 1542; Tian Jialin has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 42 rating points toward Andrea Lazaro Garcia, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Andrea Lazaro Garcia in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates You Xiaodi 1454; Dang Yiming has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 115 rating points toward You Xiaodi, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: You Xiaodi in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Alex Molcan 1664 and Vit Kopriva 1611 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 53 rating points toward Alex Molcan, which projects to a 57 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Alex Molcan in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Martin Landaluce 1606 and Marco Trungelliti 1594 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 12 rating points toward Martin Landaluce, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Martin Landaluce in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Aliaksandra Sasnovich 1682; Junhan Zhang has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 182 rating points toward Aliaksandra Sasnovich, which projects to a 73 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Aliaksandra Sasnovich in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Shi Han 1428; Tereza Mihalikova has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 101 rating points toward Shi Han, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Shi Han in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Elvina Kalieva 1614 and Ellen Perez 1386 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 228 rating points toward Elvina Kalieva, which projects to a 76 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Elvina Kalieva in 2-0, about 61 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Marina Bassols Ribera 1573; Olivia Nicholls has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 73 rating points toward Marina Bassols Ribera, which projects to a 59 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Marina Bassols Ribera in 2-0, about 53 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Tamara Zidansek 1634 and Ksenia Zaytseva 1501 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 133 rating points toward Tamara Zidansek, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Tamara Zidansek in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Linda Fruhvirtova 1561; Ye Shiyu has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 107 rating points toward Linda Fruhvirtova, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Linda Fruhvirtova in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Zhou Yi 1469 and Pablo Carreno Busta 1686 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 217 rating points toward Pablo Carreno Busta, which projects to a 76 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Pablo Carreno Busta in 2-0, about 61 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Robin Montgomery 1685; Aran Teixido Garcia has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 203 rating points toward Robin Montgomery, which projects to a 73 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Robin Montgomery in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Storm Hunter 1653; Zhang Ruien has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 203 rating points toward Storm Hunter, which projects to a 73 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Storm Hunter in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Rebecca Sramkova 1636 and Jodie Burrage 1489 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 146 rating points toward Rebecca Sramkova, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Rebecca Sramkova in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Ulrikke Eikeri 1337 and Varvara Lepchenko 1539 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 202 rating points toward Varvara Lepchenko, which projects to a 73 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Varvara Lepchenko in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Botic Van De Zandschulp 1755 and Valentin Royer 1582 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 173 rating points toward Botic Van De Zandschulp, which projects to a 71 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Botic Van De Zandschulp in 2-0, about 58 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Daniel Altmaier 1631; Cui Jie has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 195 rating points toward Daniel Altmaier, which projects to a 74 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Daniel Altmaier in 2-0, about 60 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Miomir Kecmanovic 1649 and Adrian Mannarino 1674 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 25 rating points toward Adrian Mannarino, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Adrian Mannarino in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Darya Astakhova 1513; Desirae Krawczyk has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 128 rating points toward Darya Astakhova, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Darya Astakhova in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Maddison Inglis 1601 and Yao Xinxin 1506 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 95 rating points toward Maddison Inglis, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Maddison Inglis in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Anastasia Kulikova 1473 and Anna-Lena Friedsam 1562 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 88 rating points toward Anna-Lena Friedsam, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Anna-Lena Friedsam in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Alexandra Panova 1441 and Mai Hontama 1541 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 100 rating points toward Mai Hontama, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Mai Hontama in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Adolfo Daniel Vallejo 1616 and Taro Daniel 1556 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 60 rating points toward Adolfo Daniel Vallejo, which projects to a 57 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Shintaro Mochizuki 1589 and Jaime Faria 1748 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 159 rating points toward Jaime Faria, which projects to a 70 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Jaime Faria in 2-0, about 58 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Nikoloz Basilashvili 1632 and Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 1825 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 192 rating points toward Alejandro Davidovich Fokina, which projects to a 74 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Alejandro Davidovich Fokina in 2-0, about 60 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Hubert Hurkacz 1808 and Denis Shapovalov 1776 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 32 rating points toward Hubert Hurkacz, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Hubert Hurkacz in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Kyrian Jacquet 1637 and Andrey Rublev 1816 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 179 rating points toward Andrey Rublev, which projects to a 72 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Andrey Rublev in 2-0, about 59 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Zhou Yi 1469 and Pablo Carreno Busta 1686 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 217 rating points toward Pablo Carreno Busta, which projects to a 76 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Pablo Carreno Busta in 2-0, about 61 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Botic Van De Zandschulp 1755 and Valentin Royer 1582 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 173 rating points toward Botic Van De Zandschulp, which projects to a 71 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Botic Van De Zandschulp in 2-0, about 58 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Daniel Altmaier 1631; Cui Jie has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 195 rating points toward Daniel Altmaier, which projects to a 74 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Daniel Altmaier in 2-0, about 60 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Alex Molcan 1664 and Vit Kopriva 1611 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 53 rating points toward Alex Molcan, which projects to a 57 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Alex Molcan in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates James Duckworth 1629; Te Rigele has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 276 rating points toward James Duckworth, which projects to a 80 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: James Duckworth in 2-0, about 64 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Martin Landaluce 1606 and Marco Trungelliti 1594 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 12 rating points toward Martin Landaluce, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Martin Landaluce in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Miomir Kecmanovic 1649 and Adrian Mannarino 1674 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 25 rating points toward Adrian Mannarino, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Adrian Mannarino in 2-0, about 51 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Yannick Hanfmann 1718 and Tomas Machac 1762 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 44 rating points toward Tomas Machac, which projects to a 55 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Tomas Machac in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Kyoka Okamura 1512; Ru Xi Wu has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 4 rating points toward Ru Xi Wu, which projects to a 50 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Ru Xi Wu in 2-0, about 50 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Alevtina Ibragimova 1595; Darya Khamutsianskaya has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 40 rating points toward Alevtina Ibragimova, which projects to a 54 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Alevtina Ibragimova in 2-0, about 52 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Tyra Caterina Grant 1594 and Aliona Falei 1458 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 136 rating points toward Tyra Caterina Grant, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Tyra Caterina Grant in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Kristiana Sidorova 1614; Daria Egorova has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 105 rating points toward Kristiana Sidorova, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Kristiana Sidorova in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Viktoria Morvayova 1481 and Sara Sorribes Tormo 1633 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 152 rating points toward Sara Sorribes Tormo, which projects to a 67 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Sara Sorribes Tormo in 2-0, about 57 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Rina Saigo 1496; Alexandra Shubladze has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 8 rating points toward Rina Saigo, which projects to a 50 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Rina Saigo in 2-0, about 50 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Kristina Mladenovic 1447 and Sofia Costoulas 1543 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 95 rating points toward Sofia Costoulas, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Sofia Costoulas in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Katarina Zavatska 1479 and Sofya Lansere 1373 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 106 rating points toward Katarina Zavatska, which projects to a 63 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Katarina Zavatska in 2-0, about 55 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Amelia Rajecki 1470; Wang Yuhan has too little rated history in her database and enters near the 1500 baseline, so treat this projection with caution. Net gap: 70 rating points toward Amelia Rajecki, which projects to a 58 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Amelia Rajecki in 2-0, about 53 percent of that player's winning outcomes.

Agatha rates Jessica Bouzas Maneiro 1679 and Tian Fangran 1598 on hard, built match by match from every tour-level and slam result since 2007. Net gap: 81 rating points toward Jessica Bouzas Maneiro, which projects to a 62 percent match win. Most-likely scoreline: Jessica Bouzas Maneiro in 2-0, about 54 percent of that player's winning outcomes.